Coaching Instruction in Field Training: Athletes’ Perceptions of Clarity, Motivation, and Harshness
Abstract
Coaching instruction is a crucial yet under-theorized part of field training because coaches’ verbal and nonverbal cues influence how athletes perceive tasks, manage effort, and stay motivated during practice. This study investigated athletes' perceptions regarding the significance of coaching instruction during field training, emphasizing instructional clarity, motivational influences, and the effects of a severe instructional tone on comprehension. The research used a quantitative descriptive approach. Data were gathered from 146 athletes across different sports using a validated 15-item questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The instrument was divided into three areas—clarity and delivery of instruction, athlete understanding and response, and motivational impact—and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .87). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze frequencies, percentages, and weighted mean scores. The results revealed a largely positive trend. About 93.8% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that coaches communicated training goals clearly, and the same percentage reported that coaching increased motivation and discipline. The weighted mean scores for these items were both 4.19 out of 5.00. In contrast, perceptions of harsh instruction were mixed, with a weighted mean of 3.06, indicating that athletes did not respond uniformly to forceful or emotionally intense delivery. These findings suggest that coaching instruction is highly valued when it is clear, specific, and motivating, but its effectiveness can diminish when tone is perceived as harsh. The study concludes that effective coaching instruction should be viewed not only as technical communication but also as a multidimensional pedagogical process that includes cognitive guidance, motivational support, and context-appropriate communication. The research adds empirical and conceptual insights to sports pedagogy by illustrating how instructional communication can enhance athlete learning and engagement during everyday field training contexts.
How to Cite
Views / Downloads
Files
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmat, Fadillah Kurniawan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Consterdine, A., & Taylor, W. G. (2025). Reappraising theorisations of power in the coach–athlete relationship: Future directions for sports coaching research. Sports Coaching Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2025.2569943
Côté, J., & Gilbert, W. (2009). An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 4(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1260/174795409789623892
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Davis, L., Jowett, S., & Tafvelin, S. (2019). Communication strategies: The fuel for quality coach–athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02156
De Francisco, C., Scurtu, M. C., & Vílchez, M. P. (2026). What is known about athlete engagement: A scoping review. Sports Medicine - Open, 12(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-026-00975-5
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Hjortborg, S. K., Downey, G., & Sutton, J. (2025). Coach–athlete interaction in Muay Thai: A microethnographic analysis of skill learning in a real-world combat sport. Journal of Sports Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2542588
Hogue, C. M. (2024). Caring coaching climates emerge as key factor in promoting high school athletes’ well-being and motivation, complemented by a task-involving climate. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2024.2437481
Jowett, S. (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
Jowett, S. (2024). The coach–athlete relationship within a cross-boundary team of experts: A conceptual analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2024.2416968
Kim, Y., & Park, I. (2020). “Coach really knew what I needed and understood me well as a person”: Effective communication acts in coach–athlete interactions among Korean Olympic archers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), Article 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093101
Liu, R., Wang, S., & Li, J. (2025). How coach leadership behavior influences athletes’ performance: The chain-mediated role of the coach–athlete relationship and psychological fatigue. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1500867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1500867
Longakit, J., Toring-Aque, L., Aque, F., Jr., Sayson, M., & Lobo, J. (2024). The role of coach–athlete relationship on motivation and sports engagement. Physical Education of Students, 28(5), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2024.0503
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(11), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
McGuire, C. S., Caron, J. G., & Martin, L. J. (2025). Understanding coaches’ perspectives on building trust in sport: A narrative inquiry approach. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 17(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2024.2428246
Mossman, L. H., Slemp, G. R., Lewis, K. J., Colla, R. H., & O’Halloran, P. (2022). Autonomy support in sport and exercise settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2031252
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Partington, M., & Cushion, C. (2013). An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviours of professional top-level youth soccer coaches. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01383.x
Sagar, S. S., & Jowett, S. (2012). Communicative acts in coach–athlete interactions: When losing competitions and when making mistakes in training. Western Journal of Communication, 76(2), 148–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2011.651256
Şenel, E., Jowett, S., Adiloğulları, İ., & Kerr-Cumbo, R. (2024). Investigating the impact of coach behaviours and coach–athlete relationships on psychological safety. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2024.2369717
Zhang, R., & Rhim, Y.-T. (2024). The effect of coach–athlete relationships on motor behaviour in college athletes—Mediating effects of psychological needs. Behavioral Sciences, 14(7), Article 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070579




